| Title |
Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002748.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liz Lostumbo, Nora E Carbine, Judi Wallace |
| Abstract |
Recent progress in understanding the genetic basis of breast cancer has increased interest in prophylactic mastectomy (PM) as a method of preventing breast cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 3 | 33% |
| Poland | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Czechia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 226 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 21% |
| Unknown | 39 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 115 | 49% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 7% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2019.
All research outputs
#281,445
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#467
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#726
of 111,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.