| Title |
Chelation therapy for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002785.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Vanessa Villarruz-Sulit, Rachel Forster, Antonio L Dans, Flordeliza N Tan, Dennis V Sulit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Chile | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Researcher | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 74 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 85 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2021.
All research outputs
#8,578,315
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,725
of 13,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,165
of 413,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#139
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,113 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.