| Title |
Chronic non‐invasive ventilation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002878.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Raveling, Judith Vonk, Fransien M Struik, Roger Goldstein, Huib Am Kerstjens, Peter J Wijkstra, Marieke L Duiverman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 168 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Researcher | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 92 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 94 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,404,751
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,006
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,358
of 437,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.