↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Heliox for non‐intubated acute asthma patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Heliox for non‐intubated acute asthma patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002884.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gustavo J Rodrigo, Charles V Pollack, Carlos Rodrigo, Brian H Rowe

Abstract

Helium and oxygen mixtures (heliox), have been used sporadically in respiratory medicine for decades. Their use in acute respiratory emergencies such as asthma has been the subject of considerable debate. Despite the lapse of more than 60 years since it was first proposed, the role of heliox in treating patients with severe acute asthma remains unclear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 175 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Master 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Other 40 23%
Unknown 60 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 7%
Social Sciences 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 70 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#4,280,278
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,558
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,255
of 84,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#24
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.