| Title |
Inhaled hyperosmolar agents for bronchiectasis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd002996.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna Hart, Karnam Sugumar, Stephen J Milan, Stephen J Fowler, Iain Crossingham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 57 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 8% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 64 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,173,443
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,684
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,684
of 242,643 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,643 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.