| Title |
Acetylcysteine and carbocysteine for acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections in paediatric patients without chronic broncho‐pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003124.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Chalumeau, Yvonne CM Duijvestijn |
| Abstract |
Acetylcysteine and carbocysteine are the most commonly prescribed mucolytic drugs in Brazil and many European and African countries. To our knowledge, no systematic review has been published on their efficacy and safety for acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in children without chronic broncho-pulmonary disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 24% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Namibia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 82% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 201 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 14% |
| Other | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 66 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 19 | 9% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 72 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,201,552
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,504
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,597
of 207,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#50
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.