↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Bronchodilators for the prevention and treatment of chronic lung disease in preterm infants.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
Title
Bronchodilators for the prevention and treatment of chronic lung disease in preterm infants.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003214.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ng G, da Silva O, Ohlsson A

Abstract

Chronic lung disease (CLD) occurs frequently in preterm infants. Bronchodilators have the potential effect of dilating small airways with muscle hypertrophy. Increase in compliance and tidal volume and decrease in pulmonary resistance have been documented with use of bronchodilators in studies of pulmonary mechanics in infants with CLD. Therefore, it is possible that bronchodilators might have a role in the prevention and treatment of CLD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 18%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Librarian 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 16 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,252,493
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,926
of 12,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,323
of 147,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,296 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.