| Title |
Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne C Milne, Jan Potter, Angela Vivanti, Alison Avenell |
| Abstract |
Evidence for the effectiveness of nutritional supplements containing protein and energy, often prescribed for older people, is limited. Malnutrition is more common in this age group and deterioration of nutritional status can occur during illness. It is important to establish whether supplementing the diet is an effective way of improving outcomes for older people at risk from malnutrition. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 987 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 963 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 166 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 163 | 17% |
| Researcher | 99 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 51 | 5% |
| Other | 182 | 18% |
| Unknown | 248 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 322 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 145 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 67 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 2% |
| Other | 102 | 10% |
| Unknown | 299 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,190,271
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,450
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,037
of 110,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.