↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
204 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
Title
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003326
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ken J Farion, Kelly F Russell, Martin H Osmond, Lisa Hartling, Terry P Klassen, Tamara Durec, Ben Vandermeer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cuba 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Student > Master 24 11%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 15 7%
Other 14 7%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 72 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 9%
Psychology 10 5%
Engineering 7 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 74 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,672,364
of 25,519,924 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,600
of 13,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,468
of 47,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,519,924 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.