| Title |
Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with heart failure
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003331.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cal Molloy, Linda Long, Ify R Mordi, Charlene Bridges, Viral A Sagar, Edward J Davies, Andrew Js Coats, Hasnain Dalal, Karen Rees, Sally J Singh, Rod S Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 15% |
| Spain | 4 | 10% |
| Egypt | 2 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Tuvalu | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 72% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 17 | 52% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 17 | 52% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,718,264
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,637
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,421
of 320,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.