↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Etidronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
Title
Etidronate for the primary and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2024
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003376.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

George A Wells<sup>a</sup>, Shu-Ching Hsieh<sup>a</sup>, Joan Peterson, Carine Zheng, Shannon E Kelly, Beverley Shea, Peter Tugwell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,513,845
of 25,806,763 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,930
of 13,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,285
of 220,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#39
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,763 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,114 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.