↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cervical cap versus diaphragm for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
Title
Cervical cap versus diaphragm for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria F Gallo, David A Grimes, Kenneth F Schulz, Laureen M Lopez

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 32 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Social Sciences 7 8%
Psychology 5 6%
Unspecified 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 36 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,581,829
of 25,489,496 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,740
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,718
of 50,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,489,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 50,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.