↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions for haemolytic uraemic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
216 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Interventions for haemolytic uraemic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003595.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mini Michael, Elizabeth J Elliott, Greta F Ridley, Elisabeth M Hodson, Jonathan C Craig

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 216 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 209 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 30 14%
Researcher 23 11%
Other 20 9%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Other 48 22%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 56%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 5%
Psychology 5 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 52 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,387,249
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,415
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,666
of 184,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.