| Title |
Art therapy for schizophrenia or schizophrenia‐like illnesses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003728.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Ruddy, David Milnes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 26% |
| Colombia | 2 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 26% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 46 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 60 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,926,148
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,112
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,058
of 73,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.