| Title |
Communication skills training for healthcare professionals working with people who have cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003751.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippa M Moore, Solange Rivera, Gonzalo A Bravo‐Soto, Camila Olivares, Theresa A Lawrie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 10 | 23% |
| Spain | 6 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| Italy | 3 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 769 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 768 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 89 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 83 | 11% |
| Researcher | 55 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 138 | 18% |
| Unknown | 319 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 127 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 16% |
| Psychology | 64 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 39 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 75 | 10% |
| Unknown | 334 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,127,106
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,316
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,705
of 340,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.