| Title |
Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003765.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kar W Ng, Jacqueline Parsons, Allan M Cyna, Philippa Middleton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 298 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 70 | 23% |
| Unknown | 83 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 143 | 47% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 92 | 30% |