↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters

Overview of attention for article published in this source, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Gauze and tape and transparent polyurethane dressings for central venous catheters
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, November 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003827.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Webster, Joan, Gillies, Donna, O'Riordan, Elizabeth, Sherriff, Karen L, Rickard, Claire M

Abstract

Central venous catheters (CVCs) facilitate venous access, allowing the intravenous administration of complex drug treatments, blood products and nutritional support, without the trauma associated with repeated venepuncture. However, CVCs are associated with a risk of infection. Some studies have indicated that the type of dressing used with them may affect the risk of infection. Gauze and tape, transparent polyurethane film dressings such as Tegaderm® and Opsite®, and highly vapour-permeable transparent polyurethane film dressings such as Opsite IV3000®, are the most common types of dressing used to secure CVCs. Currently, it is not clear which type of dressing is the most appropriate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 84 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 15%
Other 12 14%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 22 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 16%
Psychology 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 24 27%