| Title |
Ginkgo biloba for tinnitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003852.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Malcolm P Hilton, Eleanor F Zimmermann, William T Hunt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 8 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 23% |
| United States | 2 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Cameroon | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 84% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 10% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 14% |
| Researcher | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 48 | 17% |
| Unknown | 82 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 36 | 13% |
| Unknown | 88 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 68. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#639,073
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,156
of 13,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,195
of 211,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 212 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,134 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 212 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.