| Title |
Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists for kidney transplant recipients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003897.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela C Webster, Lorenn P Ruster, Richard G McGee, Sandra L Matheson, Gail Y Higgins, Narelle S Willis, Jeremy R Chapman, Jonathan C Craig |
| Abstract |
Interleukin 2 receptor antagonists (IL2Ra) are used as induction therapy for prophylaxis against acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Use of IL2Ra has increased steadily since their introduction, but the proportion of new transplant recipients receiving IL2Ra differs around the globe, with 27% of new kidney transplant recipients in the United States, and 70% in Australasia receiving IL2Ra in 2007. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 186 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 43 | 22% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2014.
All research outputs
#4,371,645
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,707
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,910
of 172,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#42
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.