↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Prescription of prosthetic ankle‐foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Prescription of prosthetic ankle‐foot mechanisms after lower limb amputation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003978.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheriel J Hofstad, Harmen van der Linde, Jacques van Limbeek, Klaas Postema

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 234 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Researcher 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 7%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 46 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 25%
Engineering 44 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 62 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,973
of 147,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.