| Title |
Long term hormone therapy for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004143.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marjoribanks, Jane, Farquhar, Cindy, Roberts, Helen, Lethaby, Anne |
| Abstract |
Hormone therapy (HT) is widely used for controlling menopausal symptoms and has also been used for the management and prevention of cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis and dementia in older women. This is an updated version of a Cochrane review first published in 2005. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 15% |
| Researcher | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 51 | 18% |
| Unknown | 57 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 7% |
| Psychology | 13 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,156,747
of 25,147,320 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,435
of 13,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,074
of 169,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,147,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.