| Title |
Manipulation and mobilisation for neck pain contrasted against an inactive control or another active treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004249.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anita Gross, Pierre Langevin, Stephen J Burnie, Marie‐Sophie Bédard‐Brochu, Brian Empey, Estelle Dugas, Michael Faber‐Dobrescu, Cristy Andres, Nadine Graham, Charles H Goldsmith, Gert Brønfort, Jan L Hoving, Francis LeBlanc |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 111 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 13% |
| United States | 9 | 8% |
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| Australia | 5 | 5% |
| Argentina | 4 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 88 | 79% |
| Scientists | 15 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 251 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 159 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 109 | 9% |
| Other | 74 | 6% |
| Researcher | 73 | 6% |
| Other | 246 | 21% |
| Unknown | 262 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 351 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 332 | 28% |
| Sports and Recreations | 37 | 3% |
| Psychology | 28 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 2% |
| Other | 105 | 9% |
| Unknown | 299 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#268,769
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#446
of 12,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,502
of 286,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 284 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 284 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.