↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
Title
Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non‐small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004284.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ludovic Reveiz, José‐Ramón Rueda, Andrés Felipe Cardona

Abstract

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 2, 2008 of The Cochrane Library. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) constitute about 80% of all lung cancer cases. Although surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC, fewer than 20% of tumors can be radically resected. Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities in lung cancer, contributing to both its cure and palliation. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) has been used as one approach to improve local control either alone or in combination with other treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 46 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Psychology 9 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 50 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2015.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,559
of 286,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.