↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Chinese herbal medicine suxiao jiuxin wan for angina pectoris

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Chinese herbal medicine suxiao jiuxin wan for angina pectoris
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004473.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Duan, Likun Zhou, Taixiang Wu, Guan J Liu, Jieqi Qiao, Jiafu Wei, Juan Ni, Jie Zheng, Xiao Y Chen, Qin Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 105 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 15%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Other 24 23%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Psychology 8 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 28 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2019.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,493
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,162
of 168,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#71
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.