| Title |
Rehabilitation for hamstring injuries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004575.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duncan L Mason, Victoria A Dickens, Andy Vail |
| Abstract |
Hamstring injuries are a common musculoskeletal disorder, particularly amongst athletes. Many factors have been associated with these injuries, including motor control and strength, soft tissue length and postural alignment. Well-established rehabilitation protocols are commonly used in the treatment of this condition, but their effectiveness remains questionable. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2007. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| Spain | 5 | 15% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Australia | 3 | 9% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Scientists | 6 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 283 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 278 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 30% |
| Sports and Recreations | 35 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 11% |
| Psychology | 10 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 92 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,242,150
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,612
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,942
of 287,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.