| Title |
School feeding for improving the physical and psychosocial health of disadvantaged students
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004676.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Betsy Kristjansson, Mark Petticrew, Barbara MacDonald, Julia Krasevec, Laura Janzen, Trish Greenhalgh, George A Wells, Jessie MacGowan, Anna P Farmer, Beverley Shea, Alain Mayhew, Peter Tugwell, Vivian Welch |
| Abstract |
Early malnutrition and/or micronutrient deficiencies can adversely affect physical, mental, and social aspects of child health. School feeding programs are designed to improve attendance, achievement, growth, and other health outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 34 | 49% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 29 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 61 | 88% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 525 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 517 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 79 | 15% |
| Researcher | 71 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 59 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 92 | 18% |
| Unknown | 148 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 65 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Psychology | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 74 | 14% |
| Unknown | 171 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 129. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2023.
All research outputs
#331,935
of 25,861,751 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#544
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#698
of 175,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,861,751 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.