| Title |
Short‐term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004687.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Allan A Abbass, Steve R Kisely, Joel M Town, Falk Leichsenring, Ellen Driessen, Saskia De Maat, Andrew Gerber, Jack Dekker, Sven Rabung, Svitlana Rusalovska, Elizabeth Crowe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Serbia | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 612 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 600 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 90 | 15% |
| Researcher | 76 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 51 | 8% |
| Other | 134 | 22% |
| Unknown | 138 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 217 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 2% |
| Other | 55 | 9% |
| Unknown | 154 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#620,948
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,119
of 13,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,616
of 242,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.