↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
235 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Palliation of metastatic bone pain: single fraction versus multifraction radiotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004721
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wai Man Sze, Mike Shelley, Ines Held, Malcolm Mason

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 104 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Other 14 13%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 29 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 48%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Psychology 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 34 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,211,611
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,601
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,025
of 133,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.