↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Intravenous or intramuscular parecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Intravenous or intramuscular parecoxib for acute postoperative pain in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004771.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalind Lloyd, Sheena Derry, R Andrew Moore, Henry J McQuay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Psychology 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 34 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,090,900
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,684
of 13,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,499
of 107,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,141 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.