↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
41 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
547 Mendeley
Title
Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004916.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey J Walline, Kristina B Lindsley, S Swaroop Vedula, Susan A Cotter, Donald O Mutti, Sueko M Ng, J Daniel Twelker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 547 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 539 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 70 13%
Student > Bachelor 69 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 10%
Researcher 43 8%
Other 37 7%
Other 96 18%
Unknown 180 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 178 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 52 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 3%
Neuroscience 13 2%
Other 64 12%
Unknown 206 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#866,329
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,683
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,482
of 476,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#15
of 144 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 144 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.