↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Single or double‐level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Single or double‐level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004958.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilco Jacobs, Paul C Willems, Jacques van Limbeek, Ronald Bartels, Paul Pavlov, Patricia G Anderson, F Cumhur Oner

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 262 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Researcher 28 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Other 19 7%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 77 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 113 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 86 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2015.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,840
of 193,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#101
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.