↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Family therapy for attention‐deficit disorder or attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
276 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Family therapy for attention‐deficit disorder or attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005042.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gretchen J Bjornstad, Paul Montgomery

Abstract

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is diagnosed in between 3% and 7% of school-age children and consists of the core symptoms of inattention, impulsivity and hyperactivity. Children are often treated with medication, usually stimulant medication such as methylphenidate. Stimulant medication has been found to be effective for alleviating ADHD symptoms, at least in the short term. ADHD is also treated with a variety of psychosocial and psychoeducational interventions for parents, children, and with multicomponent interventions combined with medication management. However, many patients (10 to 13% of patients) cannot or prefer not to take medication. Family therapy without medication may help to develop structure in the family, help to manage children's behaviour, and may help families cope with distress from the presence of the disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 271 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 10%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Other 59 21%
Unknown 81 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 20%
Psychology 54 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Unspecified 12 4%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 89 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2021.
All research outputs
#7,077,903
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,276
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,702
of 69,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#26
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.