↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
191 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
341 Mendeley
Title
Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005073.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janesh K Gupta, Anju Sinha, M A Lumsden, Martha Hickey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 338 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Other 35 10%
Researcher 30 9%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 8%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 114 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 4%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Other 29 9%
Unknown 124 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2021.
All research outputs
#3,422,917
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,030
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,450
of 360,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#133
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.