↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Interventions to support the decision‐making process for older people facing the possibility of long‐term residential care

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Interventions to support the decision‐making process for older people facing the possibility of long‐term residential care
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005213.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Gravolin, Katie Rowell, Jo de Groot

Abstract

The decision to enter long-term care is often a major life event for older people, made in the context of personal crisis and loss. We hypothesised that the process through which a decision to enter long-term residential care emerges affects the overall psycho-social adjustment to, and acceptance of, this decision, and may have an impact on a range of other outcomes for older persons and their carers, such as health status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 14%
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Social Sciences 11 8%
Psychology 11 8%
Computer Science 5 4%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 46 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,613
of 77,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.