| Title |
Avoidance of bottles during the establishment of breastfeeds in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005252.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Allen, Alice R Rumbold, Amy Keir, Carmel T Collins, Jennifer Gillis, Hiroki Suganuma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 28% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Ghana | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 22% |
| Scientists | 4 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 6% |
| Researcher | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 115 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Unknown | 119 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,104,925
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,239
of 13,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,740
of 442,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.