| Title |
Long‐term non‐pharmacological weight loss interventions for adults with prediabetes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005270 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Susan L Norris, Xuanping Zhang, Alison Avenell, Edward Gregg, Christopher H Schmid, Joseph Lau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 311 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Researcher | 35 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 18% |
| Unknown | 73 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 11% |
| Psychology | 16 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 11% |
| Unknown | 93 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,700,095
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,629
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,465
of 69,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.