↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Recompression and adjunctive therapy for decompression illness

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Recompression and adjunctive therapy for decompression illness
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005277.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H Bennett, Jan P Lehm, Simon J Mitchell, Jason Wasiak

Abstract

Decompression illness (DCI) is due to bubble formation in the blood or tissues following the breathing of compressed gas. Clinically, DCI may range from a trivial illness to loss of consciousness, death or paralysis. Recompression is the universally accepted standard treatment of DCI. When recompression is delayed, a number of strategies have been suggested in order to improve the outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 12%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 41 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 42 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2014.
All research outputs
#20,723,696
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,914
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,160
of 176,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#163
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.