| Title |
Insulin for glycaemic control in acute ischaemic stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005346.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Fernanda Bellolio, Rachel M Gilmore, Latha Ganti |
| Abstract |
People with hyperglycaemia concomitant with an acute stroke have greater mortality, stroke severity, and functional impairment when compared with those with normoglycaemia at stroke presentation. This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2011. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 80% |
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 270 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 13% |
| Researcher | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 18% |
| Unknown | 78 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 100 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 94 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,351,772
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,988
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,932
of 322,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#164
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.