↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Gabapentin for acute and chronic pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Gabapentin for acute and chronic pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005452.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip J Wiffen, Henry J McQuay, Jayne Edwards, R Andrew Moore

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 111 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 15%
Student > Master 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 12 10%
Other 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 31 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,571,053
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,070
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,021
of 119,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#70
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.