| Title |
Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005496.pub6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sahar Sharif, Nicholas Meader, Sam J Oddie, Maria X Rojas-Reyes, William McGuire |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 18% |
| Spain | 2 | 9% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 93 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 32 | 34% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 32 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 33 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#899,628
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,752
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,715
of 362,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.