| Title |
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005610.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciana Ballini, Antonella Negro, Susanna Maltoni, Luca Vignatelli, Gerd Flodgren, Iveta Simera, Jane Holmes, Roberto Grilli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Spain | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 448 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 85 | 19% |
| Researcher | 48 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 20% |
| Unknown | 123 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 61 | 14% |
| Psychology | 20 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 3% |
| Other | 64 | 14% |
| Unknown | 145 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,494,870
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,096
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,090
of 270,247 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#110
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,247 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.