↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Non‐pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non‐malignant diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
Title
Non‐pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non‐malignant diseases
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005623.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Bausewein, Sara Booth, Marjolein Gysels, Irene J Higginson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 341 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 12%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Researcher 35 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 9%
Other 65 18%
Unknown 104 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 65 18%
Psychology 23 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 29 8%
Unknown 113 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2013.
All research outputs
#16,783,081
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,370
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,150
of 315,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#212
of 232 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 232 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.