↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Analgesia in patients with acute abdominal pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
136 X users
weibo
26 weibo users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Analgesia in patients with acute abdominal pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005660.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Manterola, Manuel Vial, Javier Moraga, Paula Astudillo

Abstract

For decades, the indication of analgesia in patients with Acute Abdominal Pain (AAP) has been deferred until the definitive diagnosis has been made, for fear of masking symptoms, generating a change in the physical exploration or obstructing the diagnosis of a disease requiring surgical treatment. This strategy has been questioned by some studies that have shown that the use of analgesia in the initial evaluation of patients with AAP leads to a significant reduction in pain without affecting diagnostic accuracy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 198 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 28 14%
Student > Postgraduate 23 11%
Other 17 8%
Researcher 16 8%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 50 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 11%
Psychology 5 2%
Engineering 2 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 <1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 148. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2024.
All research outputs
#283,924
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#471
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,156
of 195,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.