| Title |
Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd005959.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harish Kurup, Munier Hossain, J Glynne Andrew |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 228 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 16% |
| Researcher | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 51 | 22% |
| Unknown | 47 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 124 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2011.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,649
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,957
of 130,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#85
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.