| Title |
Routine abdominal drainage versus no abdominal drainage for uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006004.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy, Rahul Koti, Brian R Davidson |
| Abstract |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the main method of treatment of symptomatic gallstones. Drains are used after laparoscopic cholecystectomy to prevent abdominal collections. However, drain use may increase infective complications and delay discharge. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 185 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 55 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 65 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2016.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,216
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,314
of 209,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#201
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.