| Title |
H1‐antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006137.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maulina Sharma, Cathy Bennett<sup>a</sup>, Stuart N Cohen<sup>a</sup>, Ben Carter |
| Abstract |
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterised by the development of crops of red, itchy, raised weals or hives with no identifiable external cause. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 24% |
| Romania | 3 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Gibraltar | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 289 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Researcher | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 53 | 18% |
| Unknown | 91 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 107 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 8% |
| Psychology | 14 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 100 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,699,214
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,654
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,001
of 270,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#84
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.