↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non‐traumatic diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
Title
Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non‐traumatic diseases
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006193.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gilberto Yoshinobu Nakama, Maria Stella Peccin, Gustavo JM Almeida, Ozório de Almeida Lira Neto, Antônio AB Queiroz, Ricardo Dizioli Navarro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Cameroon 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 355 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 61 17%
Researcher 40 11%
Student > Bachelor 39 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 10%
Other 27 7%
Other 73 20%
Unknown 86 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 151 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Engineering 18 5%
Psychology 11 3%
Sports and Recreations 7 2%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 106 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,800,952
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,860
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,867
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#78
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.