| Title |
Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006237.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karen Nieuwenhuijsen, Babs Faber, Jos H Verbeek, Angela Neumeyer‐Gromen, Hiske L Hees, Arco C Verhoeven, Christina M van der Feltz‐Cornelis, Ute Bültmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 9 | 18% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 10% |
| Spain | 4 | 8% |
| Sweden | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 73% |
| Scientists | 9 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 474 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 465 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 86 | 18% |
| Researcher | 65 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 50 | 11% |
| Other | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 95 | 20% |
| Unknown | 95 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 110 | 23% |
| Psychology | 76 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 55 | 12% |
| Unknown | 119 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2022.
All research outputs
#574,983
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#972
of 13,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,718
of 370,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 257 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 257 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.