| Title |
Interventions to prevent injuries in construction workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006251.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henk F van der Molen, Marika M Lehtola, Jorma Lappalainen, Peter LT Hoonakker, Hongwei Hsiao, Roger Haslam, Andrew R Hale, Monique HW Frings‐Dresen, Jos H Verbeek |
| Abstract |
Construction workers are frequently exposed to various types of injury-inducing hazards. A number of injury prevention interventions have been proposed, yet their effectiveness is uncertain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 2 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 123 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 17% |
| Researcher | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Engineering | 20 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,848,614
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,955
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,140
of 286,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#57
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.