↓ Skip to main content

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

First‐line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of HLA‐matched sibling donors compared with first‐line ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin for acquired severe…

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
Title
First‐line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation of HLA‐matched sibling donors compared with first‐line ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin for acquired severe aplastic anemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006407.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank Peinemann, Carmen Bartel, Ulrich Grouven

Abstract

Acquired severe aplastic anemia is a rare and potentially fatal disease, which is characterized by hypocellular bone marrow and pancytopenia. The major signs and symptoms are severe infections, bleeding, and exhaustion. First-line allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD) is a treatment for newly diagnosed patients with severe aplastic anemia. First-line treatment with ciclosporin and/or antithymocyte or antilymphocyte globulin (as first-line immunosuppressive therapy) is an alternative to MSD-HSCT and is indicated for patients where no MSD is found.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 205 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Researcher 17 8%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 7%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 58 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Psychology 8 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 56 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,993,771
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,729
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,515
of 209,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#178
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.